Reading accounts of Sunday’s Round Table Conference at
Saratoga makes me wonder just how much money The Jockey Club wasted hiring the management
consulting firm McKinsey & Company to write a report that basically
regurgitated every single idea that bloggers and racing pundits have been
advocating for years.
“Fewer, better races and better scheduling to increase field
size and showcase the best product” and “racing integrity reforms” have been
particularly popular points of contention for fans, as have no-brainer issues
like “increased television coverage”, “a free-to-play website” and “innovative
wagering platforms.” Why did it take some pretentious insider-connected firm to
finally make our long-argued complaints legitimate?
Let’s hope The Jockey Club, not to mention the industry as a
whole, takes more serious and immediate action on this report than they did the
last one in 1991 on drug testing. According to The Jockey Club president and
CEO James L. Gagliano:
No offense, Mr. Gagliano, but what malarkey! Taking on only
the superficial issues of television coverage and creating a social network
game (which apparently would be primarily geared towards women) is merely
putting a bandage on this industry hemorrhaging fans. According to their wastrel
report, McKinsey estimates that, if current trends continue, “thoroughbred racing will lose fans at a rate of 4 percent a year, and, by 2020, the fan base will be only 64 percent of what it was in 2010.” Considering the fact that
horse racing fans are, by far, an aging demographic—one that is quickly dying
out—it’s not likely they will be replaced by younger fans if all the industry
plans to do is apply a little blush and lip gloss to its product.
The McKinsey presenter concluded that all this can be done
without a “commissioner” and without wide-scale national regulatory action. So, here we
are, once again paying lip service to the real issues—and once again fretting
about what is seemingly beyond anyone’s control, the self-destructive nature of
arrogance and power.
What must be addressed is the lack of national leadership
when it comes to scheduling and conducting racing, as well as the lack of uniformity
in terms of racing regulations and wagering. The Jockey Club isn't the group to lead this fight, despite their apparent arrogant belief that they can. The bigger problem is no one entity wants
to give up their autonomous decision-making, regardless of how much this lack
of homogeny hurts the sport—and the industry as a business. Until that day arrives, nothing can right this sinking ship, merely prolonging the agony.
How much ridiculous money and time did this company charge for its completely redundant information??? Lord, lord, lord. Just shows what the suits (and get away with and commended for) on the frontside of most tracks.
ReplyDeleteLisa J
OKC
Val,
ReplyDeleteWe've all alternatively blogged about the need for a unification in the game. A commissioner as the head on the horse racing body is something that has propelled the major American sports to the forefront.
It's like Penny Chenery trying to convince the Kentucky hardboots to invest in Secretariat's stud career...she just needed one important breeder/owner to agree. Who will be horse racing's investor/visionary like Ogden Phipps agreed to be in the Secretariat syndication?
It's time for the major players in the game to step forward, become a cohesive unit, and bring thoroughbred horse racing back among the top sports in the U.S.